Someone will adopt the baby, if the mother still doesn't want it, so that is not the issue. Do you think babies who survive the attempt on their lives, should be able to sue their birth-"mothers" for negligence? Obama doesn't think so, in a covered-up document produced by him in his college years, as President of Harvard Law Review, which he never wrote one article for, before becoming the President of it, that's why I would like opinions on what you think?
Article about it, and thanks:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12705.html
PS, also, should babies have any rights?
Yes, there is a law which gives people medical-care, but they get it free because they don't pay emergency room hospital bills. Anyone can go into an American Hospital, and the Hospital cannot, under the law turn them away, with, or without insurance. Many visitors of the Emergency room do not pay the bill. First hand knowledge. Taxpayers pay for the bills in higher medical costs.
I buy my US Flag from China
Yes, that's why I support Universal Health Care.
AIM HIGH
No. That's what happened to george w bush and look at all the suffering he's brought upon the world.
Duck Hunter
Of course they should. There can be no debate about whether or not a baby is really "just a fetus" once it is out of the womb--alive--and living and breathing on its own.
Sarah S
I do, but Obama doesn't.
sparkler5240
Betcha your question get removed by the Yahooo Censors. I had 3 of the botched abortion baby rights questions removed. Guess babies just can't get respect from anyone on the left. Babies from botched abortions SHOULD be given care and all the rights of the Constitution despite what Barack Obama said. He is on tape as saying the cost of another doctor would be too costly for the woman. Shows how he values human life. He said he wouldn't burden his daughters with a "mistake." Not the words of a truly compassionate man.
Frank
"Someone will adopt the baby, if the mother still doesn't want it, so that is not the issue." - no, that's not true, there are far more children who need homes than people willing to adopt. This myth is perpetuated by pro-birthers.
Yes, they should be given medical care.
I wonder what opponents of Universal Health Care have to say about that?
ibfmarxists
Anytime a baby is viable outside the womb, it is called murder, or attempted murder, no matter how leftists try and dress it up. Not that I am against allowing them to kill themselves off.
nikolaus.baare
How else should the baby live if it doesn't receive medical care?
roostershine
I think it is sad we live in a Bush-Clintonian age of politics where people find it complete fair game to try to score political points off such things.
Honestly.
I think the Clinton way of triangulating his position as leadership is disgusting too.
Earth Needs Oil
I don't believe that there is any law that gives anyone the "right" to "free" medical care regardless of age or circunstance. And its a good chance that the baby can't pay and the mother doesn't want to.
If you wish to set up a fund to pay doctors and hospitals to provide free patient care, then i encourage you to do so. Once it is established and large enough, I'm sure the medical community will take as much from it as you allow to provide post botched-abortion care. (They will probably need to get a release form from the mothter but they can figure out how to do that)
It is suprising how haveing money to spread around can solve so many problems in our society like this one.
Orignal From: Do you think if a baby survives a botched abortion, they should be given medical care to live?
Post a Comment