This digital document is an article from Trial, published by Association of Trial Lawyers of America on May 1, 1994. The length of the article is 3676 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
From the supplier: Plaintiffs' attorneys must be prepared to counter certain spurious defenses which defendants may employ in medical malpractice cases. Defendants in cancer cases may argue that a delayed diagnosis made no difference because the patient would have died anyway. This can be countered by showing that early diagnosis significantly improves survival chances. Surgeons who argue they did not recognize a structure due to an anatomical anomaly and inadvertently damaged that structure can be countered with the argument that good surgeons anticipate anomalies since no two patients are the same.
Citation Details
Title: Countering spurious defenses. (includes related article on Association of Trial Lawyers of America's Professional Negligence Section) (Medical Negligence)
Author: Abraham Fuchsberg
Publication: Trial (Magazine/Journal)
Date: May 1, 1994
Publisher: Association of Trial Lawyers of America
Volume: 30 Issue: n5 Page: 28(6)
Distributed by Thomson Gale
List Price: $ 5.95
Price: $ 5.95
Countering spurious defenses. (includes related article on Association of Trial Lawyers of America's Professional Negligence Section) (Medical Negligence): An article from: Trial
Orignal From: Countering spurious defenses. (includes related article on Association of Trial Lawyers of America's Professional Negligence Section) (Medical Negligence): An article from: Trial
Post a Comment