Proposed Removal of Legal Aid for Medical Negligence Cases in England and Wales
Under the present scheme for Public Funding (legal aid), those claimants who seek compensation for personal injury as the result of negligent clinical treatment provided by NHS or private hospitals are entitled to Public Funding to cover the legal costs of those claims provided they are financially eligible and if their case has a reasonable prospect of success, and fulfils the public benefits test.
Under a consultation paper published by the Ministry of Justice on 15 November 2010, it has been proposed to abolish public funding for all clinical negligence cases.
In formulating this view, the Ministry of Justice accepts that clinical negligence cases are often very important, particularly where the claimant has suffered severe injuries and is seeking compensation to meet their needs in the future. However, it does not consider that spending public money on pursuing these claims is justified because there are 'viable alternative sources of funding'.
The viable alternative sources of funding to which the Ministry of Justice consultation paper refers are in the main the Conditional Fee, known as No Win No Fee Agreements.
This will mean that children, seriously injured claimants and some of the most vulnerable members of society will now need to find solicitors who are prepared to take on some of the most complex and demanding professional negligence litigation on a No Win No Fee basis. This will also include a commercial insurer who will be prepared to enter into an After The Event insurance policy to insure against the individual claimant's risk of having to pay the defence costs and their own experts' fees in the event that the claims are unsuccessful.
Many children therefore who suffer a catastrophic brain injury at the time of their birth, as a result of negligent medical treatment, will no longer be able to obtain legal aid to pursue claims for compensation for their future needs. Whilst the Ministry of Justice has considered this particular category of cases, its view is that not a high enough proportion of them take place to justify retaining public funding for clinical negligence claims as a whole.
Clinical negligence cases arise because of negligent medical care provided by treating clinicians who cause injury, often catastrophic, or sometimes even death to patients. Clinical negligence litigation is symptomatic of poor quality medical treatment not the cause of the claim. One might suggest therefore that the Ministry of Justice proposal is an attempt to treat the symptom without putting in place safeguards to protect the patient.
If the Ministry of Justice proposals are adopted then many claimants will find it impossible or extremely difficult, to find solicitors to take their cases. Anyone considering a claim, particularly a claim on behalf of a child, should contact a specialist clinical negligence solicitor sooner rather than later.
For further information please contact Alison McClure, a partner at Blake Lapthorn, member of the Clinical Negligence team and Head of the firm's Litigation Dispute Resolution department on 023 8085 7320 or at alison.mcclure@bllaw.co.uk.
Article from articlesbase.com
www.PreOp.comMedical Malpractice and Patient Education Company Your doctor has told you that need to undergo shoulder replacement surgery. But what does that actually mean? As you move your arm, the ball-shaped end of the upper arm, or humerus, moves against a cup-like depression in shoulder bone, or scapula. As long as the upper arm can slide against the shoulder, you are able to move your arm comfortably. But over time, especially in patients who suffer from arthritis, the shoulder joint can wear down. Medical Malpractice Cartilage, the tissue that cushions the bones and makes it possible for them to move smoothly against each other can wear away. When this happens, the bones run together, causing pain and restricting arm movement. No matter what the cause, one of the most effective ways to fix a damaged shoulder is to replace it surgically. In this procedure, the ball-shaped bone at the top of the upper arm is removed ... ... and replaced with a metal substitute. Medical Malpractice The shoulder socket is widened and lined with a smooth pad that allows the metal ball joint to move more freely against the shoulder blade. Shoulder replacement surgery is a major operation, but your doctor believes that the procedure -- followed up with physical therapy and time to heal -- will result in reduced pain and greater mobility. So make sure that you ask your doctor to carefully explain the reasons behind this recommendation. Medical Malpractice Medical Malpractice and Patient ...
Video Rating: 5 / 5
Orignal From: Proposed Removal of Legal Aid for Medical Negligence Cases in England and Wales
Post a Comment