assessed on a case-by case basis by citizens in a court of law?
FYI CBO study on tort reform and health care cost.
Congressional Budget Office(December 2008) estimated that imposing limits on torts for medical malpractice cases would lower malpractice premiums nationwide by about 6 percent, on average from the levels likely to occur under current law. (The savings in each state would depend in part on the restrictions already in effect.) Savings of that magnitude would have only a modest impact on total health care expenditures, however reducing total health care spending by less than 0.2 percent.
http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/99xx/doc9924/12-18-KeyIssues.pdf
Nikola
I would say a simple solution lies elsewhere. How about we get on board with the rest of the developed world and simply make it a default part of judgement that the loser pays all legal costs of the winner. This would reduce the number of speculative lawsuits filed in hopes of out of court settlement.
That is admittedly not perfect but a simple start in the right direction.
Orignal From: Should there be government decided limits on damages awarded in personal injury lawsuits or?
Post a Comment