Yes I know it sounds like an oxymoron. Just looking for an answer. An insurance company is telling me their driver is not at fault for blowing a tire which damaged my vehicle (I'm not at fault either!). Can the comparative negligence law in WI be taken into consideration for making them pay for half or more of the damages to my vehicle? Thanks for any answers to the question. Please dont reply "File a claim with you're insurance company, thats what you pay them for."
That does not answer the question at all. Who is taking advice from insurance companies?
laughter_every_day
First bit of advice is to stop taking legal advice from the insurance company that you might be opposing in court. Their opinion means nothing. If the other driver was actually not negligent at all, then he is not liable at all.
Orignal From: Can comparative negligence be taken into consideration in a no-fault auto accident?
Post a Comment