I've been working through some dental issues over the past 2 years after years in college without dental coverage. I've been referred to an Endodontist after some problems were realised, and the findings were heartbreaking. It turns out that 2 root canals my dentist performed last year are infected, 1 of which has a file broken off in it. My temp crowns were insufficiently sealed and fell off, and one of my permanent crowns came off, the other is not sealed well (feeding the bacteria and my infection). At no time were the risks explained to me. Today I find out that the molar with the crown has to be removed because the Endodontist cannot get to the infection without removing the crown AND the post installed in the crown was placed through the bone, further damaging the tooth.
Now I'm a trusting person, and one who is against frivilous lawsuits, but it doesn't seem right that I'll have to pay a co-pay to extract a tooth I've spent in the order of $ 1200 (after insurance paid ~$ 2k) to save, then pay for the replacement (a bridge or implant). I'm fortunate enough that my body's very insensitive to oral pain. Considering the hours and funds invested in repairs, is it unfair to request that the dentist pay for a portion of the final fix? I say a portion because it begins with the need of a root canal which the dentist has no control over, but there is some negligence at hand here. I'm considering consulting a lawyer, something I never thought I'd do. Is it wrong to ask for shared blame in this?
WhiteVaultGirl
I suggest you consult a lawyer. Good Luck.
Orignal From: Does enough dentists work in your best interest?
Post a Comment