Yes I know it sounds like an oxymoron. Just looking for an answer. An insurance company is telling me their driver is not at fault for blowing a tire which damaged my vehicle (I'm not at fault either!). Can the comparative negligence law in WI be taken into consideration for making them pay for half or more of the damages to my vehicle? Thanks for any answers to the question. Please dont reply "File a claim with you're insurance company, thats what you pay them for."

Gambit
You may want to repost the question in the Law and Government section of Yahoo! Answers. This isn't really an insurance question.

What do you think? Answer below!

Orignal From: Can comparative negligence be taken into consideration in a no-fault auto accident?

0 comments