I am in the process of settling my Personal Injury Claim. It is a phantom vehicle uninsured motorist claim.
I have the issue of new money settled but feel that I am entitled to Hamm fees or 1/3 of special damages but the adjuster says that Hamm v. State Farm only applies to PIP and not Med coverage.
Is this true? I have researched as much as I can and can't find the language to make my argument.
Please help...
MSAD
Here are the case details: http://www.glpattorneys.com/about/cases/casedetail.cfm?id=76
Here's the case: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/wa-supreme-court/1418901.html
If you want to make an argument. You review the case and see what it says on the matter.
Orignal From: Am I entitled to Hamm Fees if I only have Medical Coverage and NOT PIP (personal injury protection)?
Post a Comment