(8) The failure to use a safety restraint shall not be considered under any circumstances as evidence of contributory or comparative negligence, nor shall such failure be admissible as evidence in any civil action with regard to negligence.
Spandau
I don't see how this presents a constitutional issue.
In fact, I am quite sure it does not.
It seems like a clearcut procedural matter.
Matt W
You have to be personally damaged in some way to get into a courtroom. Get into an accident with someone who is not wearing a seat belt.
Orignal From: Q&A: How could I go about attacking the constitutionality of this law?
Post a Comment