Especially on infiltrated iv's.
Toodeemo
This is kind of a loaded question, but I'll give it a shot. Most states have instituted strict guidelines that must be followed before a med/mal case can be filed. Usually, the case file must be submitted to a panel or judge for review by a doctor and attorney who will determine if there is any merit to the case and if it should proceed to trial. If you file a suit without doing this, you can be sanctioned by the Court. You would have to check on the particulars in your state.
As for proving the case, usually the standard is whether the doctor provided care that is reasonable for the medical profession in the area the services were rendered. What that means is did the doc do what another doctor might have done in a similar situation. As far as infiltrated iv's, it's a fairly common occurence. Since I dont know what facts apply, I would say the doc or hospital would have to have been grossly negligent if you sustained severe damages.
While this kind of injury is common, it usually is not a med/mal case. Again, you would have to speak to an attorney in your area and have him or her investigate the matter to determine if you have a case or not. It's very difficult to address all the possible issues here. And in truth, it probably isnt a good idea to seek this kind of advice here. If you are injured, see a professional before the statute of limitations runs out and you are no longer able to file a suit if one would be proper.
Orignal From: Tips: Does anybody know about medical malpractice lawsuits?
Post a Comment